So now that I have moved to a little cottage with a back
yard, I’m allowed a pet. I want a dog. I want a dog with an ardour far
exceeding moderation. That’s my ardour. Not a dog with a big ardour. I’m not
sure what that looks like really. My mother wonders why I don’t just grow
vegetables instead. I can see where she’s going with that. Growing vegetables
might be just about as much responsibility as I can cope with. But strawberries
won’t be pleased to see me when I get home. And walking the lettuce doesn’t
have quite the same charm.
I am still flirting with the idea. I have always preferred
bigger dogs. We grew up with Labradors. Labradors with the particularly doggy
names of Sheila and Holly. (We were even better with naming kittens, I can tell
you. Sandra and Steven. Offspring of Bootsie. Oh yeah. Talented pet namers in
our family).
I have a small back yard. I can’t have a big dog. So I would
need to have a medium-sized dog with personality. When I was in Vietnam, I saw
lots of great medium-sized dogs with attitude. In Sapa, I asked our guide, what
breed of dog a particularly cute one was.
She replied, very seriously, “Eating”. Right. Um. Ok.
I have never been one for designer anything, but a lot of
pure-bred cross ‘designer’ dogs are the right size. And there was a moment
where I was pretty taken by the idea of a puggle. Come on now…pug and
beagle…little scrunched up forehead. Who wouldn’t love that? But how could I ever tell people that’s the breed of dog
I have. Puggle. Ugh. It sounds like something out of Harry Potter. Then there’s
Labradoodles. They have been around for a while and I have always shaken my head at that name. I’m sure the original idea
behind the mixing or designing of breeds was well-intentioned. Getting the best
out of each breed, avoiding the weaknesses. But I think now it’s just about the
crazy names.
A Buggs. Now that’s marginally ok…a Boston Terrier/Pug mix.
But Pomapoo or Yorkipoo…well, let’s face it, anything with poo in it is not
going to be a breed I am willing to boast I own. And Bolonoodle?? That sounds
like an ‘eating’ dog if ever there was one. Or a Dorkie. Really? The dog looks
pretty much like its name…Dachsund/Yorkie cross. Sigh. And a Hug? Siberian
Husky/Pug. Really?
Sadly, our obsession for mixing things up and creating
something new is not confined to dog breeds. I have recently been alerted to
the existence and indeed great popularity of the Cronut. A flash-in-the-pan
trendy food which originated in New York and which has now been trademarked because
everyone was getting on the Cronut bandwagon and the chef, Dominique Ansel, who
came up with this incredible pastry was getting all miffed and had hurt
feelings and so on.
A Cronut is a cross between a croissant and a doughnut. I
had to blink a few times while I thought about that. And an inevitable why?
springs to mind.
This is what Dominique himself says of his creation:
The Makings of the Cronut™…
Taking 2 months and more than 10 recipes, Chef Dominique Ansel’s creation is not to be mistaken as simply croissant dough that has been fried. Made with a laminated dough which has been likened to a croissant (but uses a proprietary recipe), the Cronut™ is first proofed and then fried in grapeseed oil at a specific temperature. Once cooked, each Cronut™ is flavored in three ways: 1. rolled in sugar; 2. filled with cream; and 3. topped with glaze. Cronuts™ are made fresh daily, and completely done in house. The entire process takes up to 3 days.
Taking 2 months and more than 10 recipes, Chef Dominique Ansel’s creation is not to be mistaken as simply croissant dough that has been fried. Made with a laminated dough which has been likened to a croissant (but uses a proprietary recipe), the Cronut™ is first proofed and then fried in grapeseed oil at a specific temperature. Once cooked, each Cronut™ is flavored in three ways: 1. rolled in sugar; 2. filled with cream; and 3. topped with glaze. Cronuts™ are made fresh daily, and completely done in house. The entire process takes up to 3 days.
Wow.
But a flaky, buttery croissant is
delicious. And a doughnut…well, I’m not a fan, but they are classic stodge. Why
put them together?
Because we can.
Clearly my imagination is inhibited. I
would never in my wildest dreams have imagined a muffin crossed with a
doughnut. And, as for what one might name such a delicacy, well…I can tell you
there was more than a bit of eye-blinking going on there. Wisely, Bea Vo, the
American baker who christened what was already a Nigella Lawson recipe, named
it Duffin. Not Muffnut. For obvious reasons, I guess.
And there are Townies – tartlet
brownies, Muggels – muffin bagels, Muffles – muffin waffles; Crookies – some
kind of crazy croissant-oreo cookie hybrid and Macanuts – where macaroon
marries doughnut and lives happily ever after.
I am shaking my head. I am all for experimentation
and innovation and not resting on our laurels. But sometimes the desire to
create is somewhat misguided. We could well heed Mary Shelley’s 1818 warning
against the over-reaching of modern man. It was Victor Frankenstein, the
epitome of a creative over-reacher, who said:
The different accidents of life are not
so changeable as the feelings of human nature. I had worked hard for nearly two
years, for the sole purpose of infusing life into an inanimate body. For this I
had deprived myself of rest and health. I had desired it with an ardour that
far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream
vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart.
Chapter 5, Frankenstein.
I’m no closer to finding the right dog.
No comments:
Post a Comment