Pierre
Roelofs is a chef.
Originally from New Zealand,
although his name and accent do not give that away, Pierre’s name has become
synonymous with deconstructed dessert fantasies.
In a
career which has seen him work through a three year apprenticeship in the
Swiss Alps, work in Michelin starred restaurants in England and Spain and pretty much everything in between, it
seems incongruous to find an international class chef producing sophisticated
innovation in the humble context of a little 25 seater cafe off Fitzroy street every
Thursday night.
Friendly
and open, Pierre eschews the molecular
gastronomy label, but having spent time at the Fat Duck in England with Heston
Blumenthal, there’s more than a nod to some of the science-meets-magic flair
that Blumenthal has become known for.
But this is no circus. Elegant and
ethereal are the words which come to mind as the dessert tube and then
three ‘courses’ are presented to me.
I do
not have a sweet tooth. I see the Life is short, just eat dessert t-shirts, I
watch the American tv depression cure of huge tubs of ice cream, I read that
Graham Kerr, whoever he is, said, “I prefer to regard a
dessert as I would imagine the perfect woman: subtle, a little bittersweet, not
blowsy and extrovert. Delicately made up, not highly rouged. Holding back, not
exposing everything and, of course, with a flavour that lasts.” I get it. People
love dessert.
I
don’t.
So. A
dessert dégustation. It felt as though I was entering a marathon. I really did
have a feeling of dread at the sugary path that lay ahead of me. Clearly Pierre
Roelof is a genius. Obviously what he does with sugar and various other
specially chosen ingredients is high gastronomic art. But I knew it would be
too much for me.
So.
Last night I went to Cafe Rosamond at 191 Smith Street, but really on Charles
Street, just off Smith Street. As I entered the small, woody restaurant,
sugary, vanilla-scented warmth enveloped me. It was cosy, given the icy climes
outside.
The
wait staff were also warm. I felt welcomed and looked after.
First
up, the signature dessert tube. This month the glass tube was filled with a
deconstructed oreo cookie. The idea is that you loosen the tube in warm water
for 3 seconds then suck. Suck until your mouth is filled with vanilla gel,
chocolate cookie and chocolate mousse. Rich, chocolaty and also light. One
inhalation and it’s gone.
Next,
is a lemon gel, crème and crumble with carrot and coconut gel, carrot squares,
roasted peanuts and peanut cake. Salty, sweet, tart and smooth. All at once. A
tiny sculptured piece with dollops of gel and squares of substance.
The
second course, or as Pierre calls it, the one in the middle, arrives. While the
first course tends to be more adventurous with savoury and often vegetable
components, the second is lighter and more refreshing and the third tends to be
more traditional and comforting.
I am not sure this was the case last night. The second offering was substantial and contained a lot which I would have called traditional. Incredible flavours and textures, but there was a lot there. I enjoyed the contrast of the salty toasted oats against the vanilla foam and vanilla ice cream with marmalade jelly and spice orange and brown sugar crumble but it did overwhelm me.
To
finish, a tiny architectural feat on a large white plate. Salted chocolate
parfait, chocolate sponge crumbs, chocolate and ginger crème, ginger meringue,
candied ginger, freeze dried raspberries and raspberry wafer. So much in such a
small space. The raspberry wafer offered a flavour explosion of tart crispness,
the ginger meringue melted immediately on the tongue. Velvety chocolate mousse
was offset by spicy ginger pieces and the chocolate sponge earthed the whole
dish.
Having
achieved a sugar coma, I floated back down Smith Street and somehow got home.
Pierre
Roelof is a very clever chef. And I am still full of sugar.
No comments:
Post a Comment